| |
Point-Counterpoint
Complimentary Tool for Active Meetings!
Overview
This activity is an excellent technique
to stimulate discussion and gain a deeper understanding of complex issues.
The format is similar to a debate, but is less formal and moves more quickly.
Procedure
- Select
an issue that has two or more sides.
For example, the former chairman of the board of a company that employs
about five hundred people has died and left a large sum in his will
for a project to be selected by the employees. Workers are sharply divided
between building a fully equipped fitness center and setting up an on-site
library for employees. Compelling arguments have been offered for each
project.:
- Divide
the participants into subgroups according to the number of positions
that have been stated. Ask each subgroup to come up with arguments to
support its position. Encourage subgroup members to work with partners
or in small cluster groups.
- Reconven
the entire group, but ask members of each subgroup to sit together with
space between the subgroups.
-
Explain
that any participant can begin the debate. After that participant
has had an opportunity to present one argument in favor of his or
her assigned position, allow a different argument or counterargument
from a member of another subgroup. Continue the discussion, making
sure that all positions are presented.
-
Conclude
the activity by summarizing and comparing the different positions.
Allow for follow-up reactions and discussion.
Variations
- Instead of holding a full-group debate, pair up individual participants
from different subgroups and have them argue with one another. This
can be done simultaneously, so that every participant is engaged in
the debate at the same time.
- Line up two opposing subgroups so that they are facing each other.
As one person concludes his or her argument, have that participant then
toss an object (such as a ball or a beanbag) to a member of the opposing
side. The person catching the object must rebut the previous person's
argument.
|